<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ham Radio product reviews online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.n0hr.com/hamradio_blog/2006/08/20/ham-radio-product-reviews-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.n0hr.com/hamradio_blog/2006/08/20/ham-radio-product-reviews-online/</link>
	<description>Ham radio towers, software, coax, DXing, contesting, and life in general</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff, KE9V</title>
		<link>http://www.n0hr.com/hamradio_blog/2006/08/20/ham-radio-product-reviews-online/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff, KE9V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n0hr.com/hamradio_blog/?p=48#comment-21</guid>
		<description>It's probably a good idea. I've come to completey ignore the reviews on eHam because you see so many guys chiming in with negative reviews and then find that they never even owned the gear - they just heard from a friend of a neighbor's buddy that a rig had a problem so they bash it on eHam.

That really makes eHam reviews useless...

Good luck with the new effort! Will be keeping an eye on how it goes.

73 de Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably a good idea. I&#8217;ve come to completey ignore the reviews on eHam because you see so many guys chiming in with negative reviews and then find that they never even owned the gear - they just heard from a friend of a neighbor&#8217;s buddy that a rig had a problem so they bash it on eHam.</p>
<p>That really makes eHam reviews useless&#8230;</p>
<p>Good luck with the new effort! Will be keeping an eye on how it goes.</p>
<p>73 de Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
